Ayodhya verdict in Supreme Court LIVE Updates: A bench-headed by Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra had reserved the verdict on July Ayodhya verdict updates: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled in a majority judgement that the mosque-namaz case need not be referred to. Ayodhya Case: The Supreme Court verdict ended with majority, Justice Ashok Bhushan, who read out the judgement for himself and the.
|Published (Last):||25 March 2004|
|PDF File Size:||6.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||1.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Supreme Court has set the date in January for the final hearing on the case. Should this question be referred to a Bench of five judges? Law is not always logical at all.
Retrieved 2 October We have verdcit find the context in which 5 judges delivered verdict in Ismail Farooqi case that mosque is not integral to Islam. However, the local official K. Switch to Hindi Edition.
Ayodhya Ram Mandir- Babri Masjid Verdict: Know in four points what today’s ruling means
Key judgment ahead of ? The mosque bore an inscription stating that it was built in A. Justice Ashok Bhushan, who read out the judgement for himself and the CJI, said it has to find out the context in which the five-judge had delivered the judgement.
Views Read Edit View history. It could also be one of the last verdicts that Chief Justice Misra deliver, before he retires.
Live updates: Supreme Court refuses to refer Ayodhya land dispute case to a larger bench
Relying on the testimonies of several eyewitnesses, the report stated that many of these leaders had made provocative speeches at the rally that provoked the demolition.
Ten days after the demolition, the Congress government at the Centre, headed by PV Ayodhhya Raoset up a commission of inquiry under Justice Liberhan. Uttar Pradesh portal Islam portal. Eternal Shrines, Contested Histories”. The title suit case would only arise after this challenge is cleared by the seven judge bench. Central Government was considering the deployment of central police forces in the area and dissolution of state government but in the end decided against it.
The Jesuit priest Joseph Tieffenthalerwho visited Awadh inwrote, “Emperor Aurangzebe got the fortress called Ramcot demolished and got a Muslim temple, with triple domes, constructed at the same place. In July, several thousand Karsevaks assembled in the area and the work for maintenance of temple started. Justice Nazir says a constitution bench must decide what constitutes essential practices of a religion and thereafter Ayodhya land dispute should be heard.
The construction of the Ram Temple is one of the key promises made by the Bharatiya Janata Party and the decision today will have a bearing on the bigger decision on the Babri Masjid-Ram Janmabhoomi title suit. Choose your reason below and click on the Report button. Get degree takes on trending news that tell you all about the issue at one place at Economic Times.
The Times of India. A subsequent land title case was lodged in the Allahabad High Courtthe verdict of which was pronounced on 30 September The Supreme Court will decide whether to revisit the issue of whether namaz or prayers can be offered anywhere – or whether a mosque is an essential part of the practice of Islam and is needed for congregation and to pray.
We welcome this decision and are confident that a just verdict will be reached over the case at the earliest: The issue whether mosque is integral to Islam had cropped up when the three-judge bench headed by CJI Misra was hearing the batch of appeals filed against the Allahabad High Court’s verdict by which the disputed land on the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid area was divided in three parts.
Supreme Court verdict could impact whether a temple will be built at Ayodhya or not. Lala Sita Ram of Ayodhya, who had access to the older edition inwrote, “The faqirs answered that they would bless him if he promised ahodhya build a mosque after demolishing the Janmasthan temple.
InGopal Singh Visharad filed a title suit with the Allahabad High Court seeking injunction to offer ‘puja’ worship at the disputed site.
The Muslim parties wanted the ruling to be reconsidered by a five-judge bench. Read Justice Ashok Bhushan’s observation.
Will be displayed Will not be displayed Will be displayed. SC to decide if ruling, which impacts Ayodhya case, should go to larger bench.